Public scoring criteria

How the ABEM Certifying Exam Is Scored—and What SurgiTest Feedback Can Measure

The examination is not graded on a curve, and each station type has distinct observable criteria. Use public scoring language without inventing a numeric cut score or pass prediction.

18 min readSource reviewed July 27, 2026SurgiTest Clinical Editorial Team

Key takeaways

  • ABEM describes the Certifying Exam as criterion referenced: candidates are judged against a predetermined standard, not against one another.
  • Scoring criteria differ by case type because the assessed skills differ.
  • ABEM evaluates examiner administration and score accuracy and uses scoring and equating processes to address differences in stringency.
  • SurgiTest feedback is educational and must remain separate from an official ABEM score, cut score, or pass probability.

Criterion referenced—not curved

ABEM states that all physicians are judged against a predetermined standard and that all candidates meeting that standard will pass. Performance is not ranked against the other candidates in the administration.

Predetermined standard

The pass decision is based on whether performance meets the required level, not on a fixed percentage of candidates passing.

Case-type criteria

The public criteria identify observable behaviors for each case type rather than one generic oral-performance score.

Examiner quality control

ABEM states that examiners are evaluated during every exam for administration and score accuracy.

Equating and stringency

ABEM states that scoring and equating processes adjust for variance in scoring stringency.

Clinical Care Case criteria

Public criteria summarized from ABEM
Case typeSuccessful performance includes
Clinical Decision-MakingFocused history; meaningful examination; differential diagnosis; appropriate tests and interpretation; stabilization and treatment; reassessment; disposition guidance; rationale; pathophysiology
PrioritizationDetermining acuity; immediate stabilizing care; responding to changing acuity and new cases; appropriate use of team resources

Communication & Procedure Case criteria

Public scoring criteria by OSCE-style case type
Case typeSuccessful performance includes
Difficult ConversationsRapport; baseline knowledge; disclosure; appropriate response and reaction; closure
Managing ConflictRapport; understanding the other position; explaining one’s own position; acknowledging divergence; shared interests; path forward
Patient-Centered CommunicationRapport; respect for perspective; effective information exchange; relevant results; shared decision-making
ProceduresIndications, contraindications, and complications; preparation; technical proficiency; post-procedure management
ReassessmentAdditional information; impact of new data; modified care; repeat assessment; next steps; treatment change; system factors
UltrasoundImage acquisition; accurate video interpretation; patient-centered care

Results and reattempt policy

  • ABEM states that scores are available within 90 days of the last day of the exam administration.
  • Candidates are notified by email when results are available in MyABEM.
  • A passing result completes the certification examination step and the physician becomes ABEM certified, assuming all requirements are met.
  • ABEM states that candidates who do not pass must wait nine months before reattempting the Certifying Exam.
  • Current policies and scheduling communications in MyABEM control individual eligibility and future administrations.

A defensible SurgiTest feedback map

Educational feedback domains—not official ABEM scores
Feedback domainObservable evidenceRepair question
Stabilization and prioritizationTime to threat recognition, first action, hierarchy, delegation, reprioritizationDid the candidate act on the sickest problem early enough?
Clinical reasoningFocused data, differential, test interpretation, rationale, pathophysiologyDid each piece of information change the decision?
Technical safetyPreparation, landmarks, sequence, troubleshooting, confirmation, post-careCould the procedure be executed safely from this explanation and performance?
UltrasoundPatient explanation, acquisition, optimization, anatomy, interpretation, integrationDid the image change care appropriately?
CommunicationRapport, clarity, emotion response, shared understanding, negotiation, closureDid the other person understand and participate in a safe plan?
ReassessmentNew information recognized, problem reframed, care changed, next step definedDid the candidate abandon the old plan when the facts changed?
Completion and timingRequired station arc completed within 10 or 15 minutesWas important care omitted because of pacing?

How to use feedback without chasing a number

  1. 01

    Repair serious safety defects first

    Delayed stabilization, missed reprioritization, unsafe procedure steps, and failure to reassess take precedence.

  2. 02

    Separate station-type weakness from topic weakness

    A candidate may know sepsis but fail prioritization, or communicate well but lack ultrasound acquisition skill.

  3. 03

    Require evidence of correction

    Repeat a new case and verify the behavior under time.

  4. 04

    Trend completion and consistency

    Readiness is the ability to reproduce safe performance across ten different rooms, not one excellent case.

Put the framework under pressure

Practice the answer out loud—not only on paper.

Voice-first cases, adaptive examiner follow-up, imaging, complications, and structured educational feedback for emergency medicine.

Start an Emergency Medicine Case

Questions candidates ask

Frequently asked questions

Does ABEM publish a numeric candidate-facing cut score?

ABEM describes the examination as criterion referenced and not graded on a curve. It publishes case-type scoring criteria, but it does not publish a simple candidate-facing numerical cut score that SurgiTest can reproduce or predict.

Is the ABEM Certifying Exam graded on a curve?

No. ABEM explicitly describes it as criterion referenced and states that all physicians meeting the predetermined standard will pass.

Are all case types scored the same way?

No. ABEM publishes different general criteria because Clinical Decision-Making, Prioritization, Procedures, Ultrasound, Reassessment, and communication stations assess different skills.

When are results released?

ABEM states that results are available within 90 days of the last day of the exam administration and that candidates are notified through email and MyABEM.

How soon can a candidate retake the examination?

ABEM states that a candidate who does not pass must wait nine months before reattempting the Certifying Exam, subject to current policy and scheduling.

Source transparency

Official references

Board requirements, dates, and candidate instructions can change. Confirm current details directly with ABEM and the Board’s candidate portal.

Continue preparing

The complete Emergency Medicine preparation system

More than a simulator. One connected path from weakness to readiness.

Practice the full exam, isolate the exact skill that broke, repair it with a specialty-specific drill or knowledge resource, then prove the correction in the next spoken response.

Full mock simulations

Voice-first specialty rooms with adaptive examiner follow-up, evolving information, scoring, and premium feedback.

Board Answer Lab + Diagnostic Reasoning

Board Answer Lab tightens structure and decisiveness. Diagnostic Reasoning trains a prioritized differential and efficient commitment.

Operation Studio

Rehearse operations as decisions, technical sequences, endpoints, alternatives, and bailout plans.

Complication Rescue

Memorize recognition, stabilization, localization, and definitive rescue while the Critical Error Vault exposes recurrent failure patterns.

Board Library + resources

Connect a weak branch to Board Library explanations, specialty Guidelines, Reading Guides, Daily Briefs, and flash-card reinforcement.

Readiness + reassessment

Turn response evidence into strengths, improvements, teaching, related learning, and the next targeted reassessment.

Specialty example

Resuscitative thoracotomy and emergency department procedure sequence

Operation Studio rehearses indication and team activation, exposure and immediate control, resuscitative maneuvers, endpoint and transfer.

Rescue branch: Peri-intubation deterioration.

Personal Case Defense

Available as an optional deeper pathway

The complete specialty curriculum does not require personal uploads. Candidates may still add fully de-identified personal-case rehearsal with the Case Defense Package.

De-identified educational material only—never protected health information.

Continue across web and the native iOS companion

Existing members keep one server-authorized account, attempt history, feedback record, and readiness profile across the web and iOS experiences.

See the free pass
$0 · no credit cardSeven days beginning with the first included live case

Start with the Free Readiness Pass.

Includes one complete live simulation with premium feedback, one Board Answer Lab drill, one Diagnostic Reasoning drill, one Complication Rescue scenario, one premium resource, a personalized readiness snapshot, and a synthetic Case Defense demonstration where applicable.

Start an Emergency Medicine Case