Plastic Surgery Mock Oral Examination Checklist
A faculty, peer, or self-directed checklist for reproducing the pressure, timing, interruptions, personal-case ownership, and recovery demands of the public format.
Key takeaways
- A full mock should include one 45-minute Case Report Session and two 45-minute Theory and Practice Sessions with separate examiner teams.
- Give the candidate 10 minutes to review Theory and Practice materials and do not coach, clue, or reinforce answers during the session.
- Use the public ABPS domains for educational debrief while making clear that the mock cannot reproduce official psychometrics.
- Randomize fully de-identified personal cases and test exact facts, complication ownership, outcomes, ethics, and organization.
Before the mock
- Define whether this is a single-session practice or a complete three-session simulation.
- Use original educational Theory and Practice cases—not recalled secure examination content.
- Prepare case stems, images, progressive findings, early complications, late complications, and backup branches.
- Select de-identified personal cases randomly; do not let the candidate choose only uncomplicated cases.
- Assign two examiners per session when resources permit and rotate teams across the three sessions.
- Remove examiner access to coaching notes that reveal the desired answer in front of the candidate.
- Create a timing plan, room transitions, and a no-device expectation consistent with the mock’s purpose.
- Agree that all feedback will be withheld until the session ends.
Case Report Session — 45 minutes
- Candidate states the patient, problem, indication, goals, and alternatives concisely.
- Examiners verify preoperative workup and patient selection.
- Candidate describes the actual operation and attending decisions accurately.
- Examiners ask about meaningful alternative treatment plans.
- Candidate explains complication recognition, treatment, communication, and outcome.
- Examiners test final function, appearance, photographs, revision, and follow-up.
- Ethical, economic, consent, coding, advertising, or professionalism issues are explored when relevant.
- Organization and consistency of the case presentation are assessed without allowing the candidate to read a script.
Theory and Practice Sessions — two blocks of 45 minutes
- Candidate receives 10 minutes to review the prepared case material before each session.
- Cases span multiple domains and are not announced in advance.
- The examiner asks one question at a time and permits the candidate to commit.
- The candidate must identify the problem, select one initial plan, and explain the rationale.
- At least one branch tests an intraoperative or early postoperative complication.
- At least one branch tests a late complication, revision, or dissatisfaction.
- At least one branch tests ethics, consent, facility safety, or professional behavior.
- Examiners interrupt and transition realistically but do not intimidate, teach, clue, or debate during scoring.
Examiner conduct checklist
Neutral delivery
Use consistent prompts and avoid approval, disapproval, coaching, sarcasm, or rescue cues.
One lead, two active examiners
One examiner may lead a case, but both should participate without talking over each other or creating a cross-examination.
Pressure through decisions
Increase difficulty by changing anatomy, physiology, resources, goals, or complications—not by withholding essential facts unfairly.
Stop at the scheduled time
Do not extend a weak session to find a passing answer or extend a strong session to prove failure.
Educational scoring sheet
| Session | Review domains |
|---|---|
| Theory & Practice | Diagnosis/Planning; Management/Treatment; Intraoperative or Early Postoperative Complications; Late Complications. |
| Case Report | Diagnosis/Planning; Management/Treatment; Complications/Outcome; Safety; Ethics/Professionalism; Case Report Preparation/Organization. |
| Cross-session behaviors | Clear initial plan; patient safety; backup plan; concise communication; recovery after interruption; consistency across teams. |
Debrief in three passes
- 01
Candidate self-assessment
Before receiving feedback, the candidate identifies the strongest decision, the most unsafe or ambiguous branch, and the case that should be repeated.
- 02
Examiner evidence
Each examiner cites the exact spoken phrase or omission that supports feedback. Avoid personality judgments and vague statements such as “be more confident.”
- 03
Repair prescription
Convert each major issue into a replacement sentence, decision threshold, or scenario to repeat within 48 hours.
Complete full-mock readiness checklist
- Three sessions completed at the published 45-minute duration.
- Different examiner teams used or behaviorally simulated.
- Ten-minute Theory and Practice review period honored.
- Personal cases selected randomly from a verified de-identified portfolio.
- At least six major clinical domains represented across the mock.
- Early and late complication branches included.
- Safety, ethics, professionalism, and organization explicitly reviewed.
- No recalled secure questions, answer coaching, or pass guarantee used.
- Debrief produced no more than three priority repairs.
- Priority repairs scheduled for repeat practice before another full mock.
Put the framework under pressure
Rehearse the exact decisions in your own cases.
Voice-first cases, adaptive examiner follow-up, imaging, complications, and structured educational feedback for plastic surgery.
Questions candidates ask
Frequently asked questions
How many examiners should a mock use?
The public ABPS format uses three teams of two examiners. A full mock should approximate that when feasible; a smaller program can rotate examiner roles while preserving neutral delivery and separate sessions.
Should faculty tell me whether I passed the mock?
A mock can use an internal educational threshold, but it should not imply that it reproduces the official ABPS result. Specific domain evidence and repeatable repairs are more useful than a false pass prediction.
Can I use the same personal case in every mock?
No. Randomize the portfolio. Repetition is useful for repair, but predictable selection hides gaps in recall and ownership across the other cases.
Source transparency
Official references
Board requirements, dates, and candidate instructions can change. Confirm current details directly with ABPS and the Board’s candidate portal.
Continue preparing